Katie March

Essay 1

Word Count: 1031

 

The Importance of Audience


3

My father has always told me that one of the most important things in life is presentation. When I was a little girl I would get in trouble for whining and throwing temper-tantrums to get my way, and my father would always explain to me that people would be more likely to listen to me if I presented myself more positively. My dad, a lawyer, implanted the belief in me that if I presented myself well I would be much more successful. This lesson has been life-changing for me. Because of my presentation during job interviews I have acquired prestigious jobs, had grades changed because of how I talked to the teacher, and I have done well in school because of how I present my work in assignments, especially my writing. If writing is not presented well to its reader, it will not be well-received and will have no lasting impact on society.  Composition scholars have differing views about the importance of audience, however, the fact remains that writing holds no worldly importance without adequate presentation.


4

            Peter Elbow discusses his opinions about the position of “writer” being preferential in his piece, “Being a Writer vs. Being an Academic: A Conflict in Goals.”[1] One of the differences Elbow points out between the two positions is the importance of audience. He argues that writers need time away from their readers to improve their writing, just like parents sometimes need time away from their children.[2] Writers, according to Elbow, should take time to write only for themselves without considering their potential readers. Elbow advocates a classroom without teachers and freewriting exercises where students write for a designated period of time without a topic and without stopping or editing. These exercises try to encourage thoughts and voice and lift writer’s block by allowing students to simply write what is on their mind.[3] However, these exercises also encourage bad writing behavior from students such as misspellings, poor grammar, and rambling, run-on sentences. The sole purpose of these exercises is to encourage thought and expel writer’s block, something that could be accomplished by a class discussion, topic list, or simply thinking in a different direction. While practicing writing is a necessity in order to become a proficient writer, the practice should be in crafting comprehensible and quality writings, not incoherent drivel. Freewriting encourages bad habits in writing and sets a mental precedent that allows grave mistakes in the work.


3

 Good teachers are necessary to teach students how to use their writing to speak to their audience, the most important and difficult task for any writer. Without being able to manipulate their audience, students are unable to write sufficiently for their teachers, professional writers are unable to find a publisher and the hard work of writers will never be read and have no impact. Writing only for yourself may be useful in the form of a journal or grocery list, but unless you’re Anne Frank or have a nosy little brother, your personal writing will not hold any importance after you remember to pick up your milk and eggs. If a writer wants to hold lasting importance and have their work read, taught, and reviewed they must write something that an audience would enjoy and could relate to.


1

            Writers need to be taught many different techniques to be able to present their writing well and please their audience. One of the most important and irrefutable skills a writer needs to possess is proper spelling and grammar. No audience, especially an educated audience, wants to read something that is poorly written and indecipherable. The well-respected and well-known writer David Bartholomae writes about revising his own work in “Against the Grain.”[4] Bartholomae writes that he still does a lot of revision in his own work, completely changing his writing between the first draft and the second. Bartholomae says that before he learned to revise his work he had great ideas, but he did not present them well, his dissertation was even rejected because it was written poorly.[5] Teaching students to revise their work will instill good habits and make their writing easier to understand and less distracting. Students also need to learn how to use their voice to make their writing more interesting to their audience. Many scholars discuss the importance of voice, but personal voice needs to be tailored to make writing more readable. Many great ideas have been disregarded due to poor presentation. The Greensboro sit-in was not the first attempt to desegregate public places, but it was well-publicized because of the manner in which they did it. Although many scholars dislike the academy’s influence on a student’s writing, the academy does hold importance in standardizing the way we write so it is easier to decipher and understand academic language.


2

            To be considered a good writer in the academy, among the community of writers, and according to the public a writer needs to possess a multitude of qualities. To impress the academy writers need to have an impeccable writing style, good grammar and word choice and unfaltering spelling. To be accepted by other writers a writer needs to have new ideas and a creative approach. Most importantly, to be read by the public, a writer needs to possess the quality of being a clear and comprehensible writer. This skill does not come from unrestricted ramblings which teach bad habits, but from practicing good writing skills in all writing situations. All writings, from a dissertation to a journal should follow the rules of good writing. In order to become a better writer the writing must be good, otherwise bad habits, sloppy writing, unclear thoughts and other problems will plague the work. Freewriting can be effective, but only if used to teach good writing and in conjunction with other teaching methods, the best way to learn good writing is still to be taught how to write well.


1


[1] Peter Elbow, College Composition and Communication,vol. 46 no. 1 (National Council of Teachers of English, 1995), 72-83.

[2] Ibid., 76-77.

[3] Peter Elbow, Writing Without Teachers, (New York: Oxford University Press, 1998), 3-11.

[4] David Bartholomae, Against the Grain, (University of Pittsburgh), 19-29.

[5] Ibid., 22-23.

Posted by historymajor255 on September 15, 2008
Tags Uncategorized

Total comments on this page: 34

How to read/write comments

Comments on specific paragraphs:

Click the icon to the right of a paragraph

  • If there are no prior comments there, a comment entry form will appear automatically
  • If there are already comments, you will see them and the form will be at the bottom of the thread

Comments on the page as a whole:

Click the icon to the right of the page title (works the same as paragraphs)

Comments

No comments yet.

mjt42 on paragraph -1:

wait i’m confused, is it the audience thats important or the way a work is presented to that audience cause they are completely different

September 16, 2008 1:04 pm
mjt42 on whole page :

your title was clear and concise but your paper didn’t follow that, i’m sorry but i was unclear to weather it’s more important to have a well written paper or and audience.

September 16, 2008 1:10 pm
Steve on whole page :

Your paper is well organized. It flows well and your voice matches your agrument. Good Job!

I have trouble finding the purpose of your paper. There are three possibilities that I see: Elbow is not correct in his beliefs, Teacher need to make sure there is structure in the classroom, Writers need to consider their audience. I can’t see a clear purpose for your paper, or rather, I can’t see the main purpose for your paper. Since you use the “Academic” voice you can easily state the purpose outright and it wouldn’t be out of context.

September 18, 2008 8:22 am
MattL on paragraph -1:

Nice premiss

September 18, 2008 1:30 pm
mattl on whole page :

Seems more like the final paper then a draft, great work

September 18, 2008 1:35 pm
bballd2123 on whole page :

Hi Katie!
I enjoyed your paper, and I liked that you began with a personal story. However it wasn’t clear to be what the thesis or purpose of the paper was.
Maria

September 18, 2008 11:09 pm
mbirely on whole page :

Katie,
What a great start to your paper. You have an amazing style. I loved reading your paper. I like the way you start with a personal story and work into your ideas. I am wondering where you stand on the issue of writing in the classroom though. Maybe work this into the begining, maybe even how presenting your yourself clearly has impacted your writing and why. Thanks for sharing your paper!
-Meagan Birely

September 18, 2008 11:51 pm
Katie B. on whole page :

Katie-
First of all, great name :)

Ok now to business, your paper is really great, I like the structure of your paper. You did a great job with delivery the points. Great Job!
thx,
Katie

September 19, 2008 1:35 pm
Nicole on paragraph 6:

Very nice first paragraph, with your main point easy to pick out and understand.

September 20, 2008 5:29 pm
Nicole on paragraph 7:

Interesting take on free writing…

September 20, 2008 5:30 pm
Nicole on paragraph 8:

Excellent point.

September 20, 2008 5:31 pm
Nicole on paragraph 11:

I love your use of endnotes. It makes your paper much easier to focus on without having citations inserted everywhere.

September 20, 2008 5:33 pm
Nicole on whole page :

This is an extremely well written paper, Katie! You have a fantastic voice and are a great advocate of the topic you discuss. I can see that your argument is that students need to be taught to write well in order to be an effective presenter.

September 20, 2008 5:35 pm
Caitlin on paragraph 7:

Katie,
I like that you take a different stance on freewriting than anyone else. It’s nice to see a different way of thinking about that exercise.

Caitlin

September 20, 2008 7:49 pm
Caitlin on paragraph 9:

I like that you add history to your paper. I can tell you are a history major and it adds alot to your voice in this paper.

September 20, 2008 7:51 pm
stan4562 on whole page :

Really great intro and conclusion. I loved the personal story in the beginning. However I am unclear as to where your stance is on this issue. Are you more audience? I am guessing that cause of the title but I would then make your point more one sided.

September 21, 2008 8:59 am
Kayla on paragraph 6:

this paragraph is great! The first sentence especially just pulls you in and says with a bang, “this is what is important, and this is what this paper is about” great job! :-)

September 21, 2008 11:45 am
Kayla on whole page :

you seem to be arguing two different points here: good writing and the importance of audience. I think these can and do (at some points within your actual argument) go hand in hand…like that the paper will not be effective for the audience if not written well. Your problem seems to be only that in certain places where you are arguing for good writing, your aren’t adequately pointing back to the audience, especially in the last sentence of the paper. Just go back and look through your points and make sure you keep referring to your main point…the importance of audience.

Actually I just realized that the paper is the importance of PRESENTATION, which really is about writing well and connecting with the audience….so then maybe your problem lies in the title rather than the paper.

September 21, 2008 11:57 am
Sarah Shinners on paragraph 6:

Good intro. I like your personal example. You could maybe just take out a few sentences that sound very similar to other sentences. Like I think you said twice that your dad told you presentation is important. But it’s still a great opening, and sets up what you are going to talk about.

September 21, 2008 12:38 pm
Sarah Shinners on paragraph 7:

Wow you have a strong opinion there. A different take on what most of the rest of us have said. Very interesting. It fits well with your argument that an audience is always important. In the first sentence the word “being” is confusing. I would change it to a more active verb.

September 21, 2008 12:42 pm
Sarah Shinners on paragraph 8:

Sadly I think this is true. The only way you’re going to make an impact as a writer is if you do it for an audience. Very good point. This argument makes perfect sense.

September 21, 2008 12:43 pm
Sarah Shinners on paragraph 10:

good conclusion. The last sentence has a comma splice, though I think. Either use a semicolon or a period. Otherwise, great conclusion, it sums everything up well.

September 21, 2008 12:46 pm
Sarah Shinners on whole page :

Good paper overall. The only thing I would consider working on, is that you bash Elbow pretty well in your second paragraph, but you also seem to advocate creativity as a means for presenting to an audience. Maybe you could say that while you disagree with his method about writing for yourself, you do agree with him about using creativity and finding your voice. There are also a few minor grammatical errors thoughout, a few places where you have a comma, but you should have a period or semicolon, and also a few places that need commas. Otherwise, this was a great paper and had a different take than other papers I’ve read. Good job!

September 21, 2008 12:49 pm
Jacqueline Van Hazel on whole page :

I thought your paper seemed a little mechanical at times, it was hard to find your voice. Your paper is very polished though, and I never felt confused by your sentence structure or grammar. Nice job on those things. I think maybe if you worked a little less on the presentation of your paper and a little more on your own argument, then your essay would be perfect. You have a wonderful vocabulary and a strong voice. No reader would ever miss your voice or have an opportunity to ignore it, and I liked that. You also quote very well, it’s a nice mix of your own content, and the evidence that you wanted to present.

Sincerely,
Jacqueline

September 21, 2008 2:29 pm
Rachel Hillmer on whole page :

This was a an excellent paper. I really liked how you took a different approach from the common idea that the academy does nothing for writing and is only their to block out individuality. I agree that the reader must be considered when an author is writing. The only thing that I wished you would have addressed more is the question of whether the writer should write what they believe or cater to the desire of their audience. There is a fine line between the two and that may be something interesting that you could address more in your essay.

However, this is a very strong essay. I hope my comments helped.

Rachel Hillmer

September 21, 2008 3:01 pm
hein9311 on whole page :

Very well organized, but if you’re going to argue something you need to be much more convincing, I felt a little strained when trying to figure out your position. Other than that, fantastic.

September 21, 2008 3:38 pm
prat9517 on paragraph 8:

I like your analogies. It drives your point home.

September 21, 2008 5:10 pm
prat9517 on paragraph 10:

I like your conclusion, and I agree. Language must be organized for it to make sense, no matter what kind of writing it is.

September 21, 2008 5:11 pm
prat9517 on whole page :

I like that you used endnotes, it makes your paper look professional. I think you need to work on your intro and the second paragraph. You have some really good points, but your paper didn’t draw me in. Also, try using some more descriptive words, e.g. try effective teachers, or knowledgeable teachers, instead of good teachers in paragraph 8.

Good job.

September 21, 2008 5:14 pm
Kara on whole page :

Katie,
Excellent paper.
I like the personal stories and examples.
However, I was left wondering where you stood on the issue.
Thank you
-Kara Jay

September 21, 2008 8:29 pm
Brianna on whole page :

Katie,

This paper is very clear, concise, and readable. I like the fact that you’ve chosen to stick to one topic–audience.

I also like the fact that you’ve discussed a number of writing issues within the context of audience.

How should teachers vary their methods in order to underscore the importance of audience to their students?

Great job.

-Brianna

September 21, 2008 9:00 pm
nono8 on whole page :

Katie,
Nice job in presenting your argument in a concise manner. The issue of grammar was an interesting argument because I know when I read others’ writing I like to be able to understand their message without the distraction of language mistakes. So if you don’t like free writing exercises what else do you recommend a teacher should have his or her students do for writing exercises? Thanks for sharing your paper.
~Noel

September 22, 2008 6:28 am
nono8 on paragraph 7:

I agree with you that sometimes in freewriting a student can just end up rambling on and not produce quality work. This opinion strongly supports your argument.

September 22, 2008 6:32 am
Chelsea on whole page :

I liked how your paper stayed on one topic. It was nice and concise. Nice job!

September 22, 2008 7:45 am
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture.
Anti-Spam Image

Create an account (optional) | Login